I made the decision early on not to make writing my career, partly
because I didn’t want to have to write to commission. But I have done so many
times, mostly because it’s hard to resist. A poem for a show where poets
respond to visual art? Fun!Thoughts on the 50th anniversary of the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights? I have many!
The down side of writing to commission is the phenomenon of
the deadline. It’s no coincidence
that the word contains death. There’s a sense of doom as they approach. I have
a habit of waiting nonchalantly until deadlines are so close I can see their
eyeballs. At that point, panic and inspiration are indistinguishable. I’m not a
natural procrastinator. There’s just something addictive about the rush of
meeting a deadline by the skin of my teeth. And since I seem to meet them every
time, I’ve come to accept that this is just how I do things.
But it makes me wonder about inspiration. My commissioned
work always feels different to me, faintly inferior, like a clever knockoff.
There’s an artificiality about the inspiration that produced it. I keep my
commissioned poems separate from the body of my ‘real’ work. So what does that
say about the muse out of which unbidden poems arise?
Saul Bellow said: “You never have to change anything you got
up in the middle of the night to write.” He was so right! Samuel Beckett said
that a poem is never finished. He kept endlessly tinkering with his. He was so
wrong! I feel it is a crucial part of my craft to know when a poem is finished,
just as it must be for an oil painter. You can keep slathering words like more
paint on the poem, or changing a word here or there until you drive yourself
crazy. I tried to train myself early on to recognize the subtle settling that
occurs with a poem, like something finally fitting perfectly the space that has
been carved out for it. You make that final change and the thing is done. Time to move on.
Sort of like blog posts….
No comments:
Post a Comment